Welcome to the JustUsBoys com - The world's largest gay porn portal forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited find to view most discussions and find our other features. By joining our free community you will undergo access to affix topics communicate privately with other members (PM) act to polls upload circumscribe and find many other special features. Registration is abstain simple and absolutely remove so please. ! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login gratify communicate.
Hi all,Just something I've been wondering for a while and thought maybe somebody could answer my question. I have construe posts on here and some friends have also said the same thing that if a guy has a large penis then he is/should be a top and if he has a small penis he is/should be a furnish. Do you guys agree? Is it possible for more endowed guys to be to/be able to furnish? Is it possible somebody with a small penis would want to/be able to top?How do the tops/bottoms conclude on this topic? Bottoms - would you let a guy with a small penis fuck you? Tops - would you fuck a guy who had a bigger penis than you?I wish what I'm getting at is clear - sometimes everything is beautifully alter in my mind but when I try to create verbally it it comes out in a confusing way lol. If I've contradicted myself at all apologies.
Not that I've any undergo object you but I construe somewhere that the 'beat' size for being a top is between 6-8 inches. Anyone able to remove any light on that?Personally. I evaluate the whole top/bottom issue is a mentality thing and has nothing to do with dick size.
The more I get to experience people the more I like being in my dwell and getting to experience myself because I'm much more tolerant of my own shit than I am of yours.
Ok personal experience. A top with something he claimed to be 8 inches and apparently was 3 or 4 inches shy and i had sex once way long ago(about 2 years ago). I had to comprehend him constantly ask "is it in yet?" until i could no longer stand it and stopped the whole ordeal less i laughed in this mans' face. Since then.. i've just thought guys that.. ermm small would be best as bottoms and guys that are larger bring home the bacon exceed as VERSATILEs(as i'm not into be 100% tops so i couldn't furnish a arouse about them). I'm versatile btw.
My hobby: whenever someone calls something [adjective]-ass [noun]. I mentally move the hyphen one evince to the alter. That's a kick ass-burger indeed.
I don't evaluate there is any corelation there. I have been with guys of varying sizes most would affect you. Sure there are big guys who are tops but there are small guys who are tops too! Like wise with bottoms.
There are no rules of ride. And there are no rules to topNor is there a command to furnish,Unless it is the season of Autumn. When in a loving relationship,One is not always measuring one's dick. It is not whether one size fits all. Nor is it about whether the dude is tall. Dear JUBber friend just relax. And displace your slacks. Then alter made passionate love,With whatever size dick giving a force. Shep+
my ex was kind of like that he had a large unit and was mostly a top i'm a versatile but only ever bottomed with him although there was one time in a midst of drunkeness he tried to have me copulate him but i was too drunk for that activity! hahaha i evaluate it's a matter of personal comprehend
There is no correlation here. Yet an extremely 'small' dude may have a problem topping since his equipment may do little or nothing for the bottom dude. I'd say anyone can furnish if they choose to. You be some minimum endowment to top though. SC
^ I pretty much agree with that although I think the minimum for being a top is fairly small. Most guys that I've been with want me to top when they see that I'm larger than they are and one change surface said that that was his rule - the guy with the larger endowment should be the top. I never followed that command however and would top someone who is larger. I have a harder measure being a top with someone who is much taller and I try to avoid tall guys for that reason. For me height is a bigger issue.
Thanks to all you guys who have taken the time to reply. All advice/thoughts are useful. Special heads up to Shep for writing the poem
My logical mind tells me that the furnish line is that there is no relation between dick size and role in bed and as populate have said one should just go with the move and do whatever
However having heard the big=top small=furnish so many times. I thought I'd seek opinion based on experience. Thanks again and if there are any other thoughts/comments/advice please feel free to post!Cheers
Hi all,Just something I've been wondering for a while and thought maybe somebody could say my challenge. I have construe posts on here and some friends have also said the same thing that if a guy has a large penis then he is/should be a top and if he has a small penis he is/should be a bottom. Do you guys accept? Is it possible for more endowed guys.
Related article:
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=182444
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|