On 23 Okt. 01:15. "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo com> wrote:> Dear Silly Mother Fucking Retard Bastard,> Dear Darling Son,>> So now your sister is not a pig but a goat?> Do you also call your mother a goat? Son,> it does not matter what you have in mind your> mother's and sister's vulvas as the bottom> line is that I pay them for spreading their> legs for the night and days of my pleasure.> I will let you suck my cant when you> turn sixteen in ten years time.>> "qw" <qwi...@yahoo com sg> wrote in message>> news:119378075.761603.271650@t8g2000prg googlegroups com...>>>>>> > that's a said..> > you'ew totally drunk..> > i have no sister.> > so whose sister you play with ?> > let me think...>> > my pig have no sister either..> > oooo. i remember..> > that's be my goat....> > but why you call it sister ?> > he is a male..> > can you see the different between ass of goat and vagina of goat ?> > ohh my dear child...> > you're so mesh when you're drunk..>> > you change surface can't see the different between goat'ass and goat's vagina..> > so. you put your head on gost ass ??> > BWAAHAHHA....>> > uppss. sorry. i don't convey to laugh at you..> > of course you're my dear child..> > you need a love of a parent..> > gratify forgive your mom which ingnoring you..> > poor lky. go to me my child..> > don't be sad...- Sembunyikan teks kutipan ->> - Tampilkan teks kutipan -
On 23 Okt. 01:47. "LKYs care" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo com> wrote:> Dear Silly Mother Fucking Retard Bastard,> Dear Darling Son,>> Wow! It seems that your medical condition is> worst than I thought it to be. So according to> you your mother and sisters are goats and pigs,> but only that your mind now forces you to believe> that they are all dead or don't exist? Well this is> a very good enter. Now we know what could be> going do by with your medication. We will> alter the concentration to your advantage.>> Besides I still pay for fucking your care and> sisters.>> "qw" <qwi...@yahoo com sg> wrote in message>> news:1193079901.03587.111800@k35g2000prh googlegroups com...>>>>>> > of course the drunken shemale like you can't remember or known that is> > a goat and a pig..> > you don't remember that you put your head in goat ass.. LOL> > you also undergo no penis your mom teold me tha so your name is lky..> > means can licking only (am i alter ?)>> > about drunk..> > you know what i'm sure about it ?>> > i've no sister. my mother dead already..> > if she still life her age more that 100 years..>> > so don't tell me that you play with ghost. ha. ha. ha..> > (uppss. sorry again don't mean to laugh at you)..>> > i'm really sorry about you lyk my child..> > i experience you've been frustasing about loosing your penis..> > and now you became a shemale..> > i know you always imagine that you're a boy..> > so. face up the truth dear. don't be sad..>> > now act a bath brush your teeth and go to bed take a rest..> > you will fine after that my child..- Sembunyikan teks kutipan ->> - Tampilkan teks kutipan -
"Chairman Mao says:" <Mao-ze-Dong@prc com> wrote in message news:471cc1fe$0$516$815e3792@news qwest net...> Where is that link that doesn't allow non-japanese people in places in > Japan as of this decade?>>> Someone post those pictures again.>>> "JohnK" <Duh@Duh com> wrote in message > news:Gs2Ti.256093$ax1.247136@bgtnsc05-news ops worldnet att net...>>>> "bitter anko" <kaz762@hotmail com> wrote in message >> news:1193034360.568958.91060@v29g2000prd googlegroups com...>>> On 10 20. 1:32. "JohnK" <D...@Duh com> wrote:>>>> "bitter anko" <kaz...@hotmail com> wrote in message>>>>>>>> news:1192810363.335664.286200@e9g2000prf googlegroups com...>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On 10 19. 10:07. "JohnK" <D...@Duh com> wrote:>>>> >> "bitter anko" <kaz...@hotmail com> wrote in message>>>>>>>> >>news:1192791112.724422.101170@y27g2000pre googlegroups com...> Nobel>>>> >> winner suspended James Watson over comments>>>>>>>> >>.>>>>>>>> >> > This funny scientist claims that albino species is superior to the>>>> >> > coloreds such as the japs. Africans. Hawaiians. He probably has >>>> >> > the>>>> >> > allegedly superior Korean Hun blood despising the japs. Africans.>>>>>>>> >> No he doesn't. Read the fucking bind you retard he only refers to>>>> >> Africans and Blacks.>>>> >> Try as you may you just ain't color. Give it up.>>>>>>>> > The japs are a type of the color race. All coloreds are Blacks. >>>> > Blacks>>>> > are not only Africans. All Pacific islanders such as the japs. >>>> > Maoris,>>>> > Hawaiians are also Blacks.>>>>>>>> No they're not you stupid stupid idiot.- ->>>>>>>> - ->>>>>> You are utterly bullshit. Until the 70s the japs had to use a toilet>>> noticed as "for colored". Otherwise they ended up in jail or were>>> killed.>>>>>>> No I'm not "utterly affect" you moron. Duriing WWII on the west coast >> there were signs that read>> "NO JAPS". That meant Japanese and Japanese-Americans. Such signs do not >> exist anymore.>> The "FOR COLORED" signs in the US south are meant for Negroes as the >> term "colored" meant>> Black as in African-American. Again such signs do not exist anymore.>> You are probably aware but in denial of the fact that Apartheid South >> Africa which was far more segregated>> than the United States in the 1970s had designated Japanese as HONORARY >> WHITES.>> I presume this where you get your obsession with the term "honorary".>> I don't know why you're so obsessed with race when that is the least of >> your problems far far behind>> being a fucking retard. Somehow I get the feeling you're the Japanese >> version of...>> I may be stupid.. and I may be ugly... but at least I'm White.>>>>>> A "whites only" sign at a barber shop on Moss Street in Lafayette might >> grab your attention and take you back to the Civil Rights era. >> >> Well at least Herbert didn't put up a NO NAPPY HEADS sign. Good for him,.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Oct 21. 11:09 pm. Davej <galt...@hotmail com> wrote:> On Oct 21. 9:14 pm. "ltl...@hotmail com" <ltl...@hotmail com> wrote:>>>>>> > On Oct 21. 10:11 pm. Davej <galt...@hotmail com> wrote:>> > > On Oct 21. 7:46 pm. "ltl...@hotmail com" <ltl...@hotmail com> wrote:>> > > > On Oct 20. 6:10 pm. "Supertech" <ejo...@realtime net> wrote:>> > > > > God must have personality. God is not a universe or a nature or an> > > > > object. So God must resemble human in character. No wonder some> > > > > people believe humans invented God. On the question of who created> > > > > God.>> > > > Asumming there is a God. comfort what we can understand this God and> > > > how we can understand this God cannot be beyond the human> > > > common comprehend. Else it is indescriptable and cannot be comprehended> > > > by human minds.> > > > [...]>> > > If you be to accept there is a Gawd and you want to try to> > > understand that Gawd then the only way to do this would be to look at> > > nature. What do you see in nature? Forget the mystics and their> > > "inspired" writings. be at nature.>> > "Look" entails the using of human common sense. Not "looking" as a> > bat or a fail bee ordain look.>> "Look" entails careful analysis. "Common comprehend" is the sense that any> cozen has.
<fifo213@googlemail com> wrote in messagenews:1193077687.824267.213170@e9g2000prf googlegroups com...> This is the transcript of the speech by NCMP and Workers' Party> head Sylvia Lim in Parliament on the Penal Code amendments. (The> video is here on CNA's website.)>> TOC would like to convey Ms Lim for providing us with the transcript.>> Read also TOC's earlier report on the WP's Penal Code forum. "Are we> moving towards a punitive society?">> Mr Speaker Sir,>> The Ministry of domiciliate Affairs first floated the Bill for public> consultation a year ago. I am glad to see that in this version tabled> before Parliament some of the feedback has been taken into account.>> Scope of Speech>> Nevertheless there are still many areas of concern. Today. I would> like to address the following aspects of the Bill in principle:>>> (a) Increases in Punishment>> (b) Laws on unlawful assembly>> (c) Combination of imprisonment fine and caning for the same offence>> (d) Defences concerning security operations>> (e) The law on extortion>> (f) Why the bill should be sent to Select Committee.>> Increases In Punishment>> Generally I have no quarrel with the increase in fines as it reflects> the changed value of money due to inflation in the past decades. To> pay a fine of $500 in the past hurts people more than to pay $500 in> today's dollars so the change magnitude in fines is understandable.>> However. I have deep concerns about the increase in maximum jail> terms. The loss of liberty 20 years ago does not cost less today.>> As MHA has acknowledged there have been increases in the maximum> terms of imprisonment for 110 offences. Besides the broad sweep the> extent of the increases for each offence is significant - some> offences have their maximum terms quadrupled some tripled.>> To take some examples: punishment for several offences undergo doubled> e g the distribution of pornographic material from 6 months to 1> year harbouring offenders from 10 years to 20 years causing hurt> from 1 year to 2 years. In some cases the punishment has been tripled> or worse e g assault on a Minister or MP from 7 yrs to life> imprisonment and unlawful assembly from 6 months to 2 years a> quadrupling of maximum sentence. I shall say more about unlawful> assembly later.>> Another assort of offences which seem to be attracting heavier> punishments is offences committed by public servants and offences> committed against public servants. Jail terms are up for S221 and 222> where a public servant facilitates escape of persons in custody. The> same is true of offences committed against public servants e g under> S 225 the punishments for someone who tries to obstruct an arrest are> being doubled and can go up to 20 years confine.>> The command justification given by the Ministry is that it has taken> into account trends in society from 1984 to now and that punishments> have not been increased unnecessarily. But I do not think this general> statement is sufficient to justify disturbing these penalties which> seem to have worked for years.>> First punishments reflect how seriously society views a particular> crime; hence we punish murder more seriously than theft. By> quadrupling or tripling the maximum jail term is the Ministry saying> that from 1984 to now these crimes have become 3 or 4 times more> serious in their nature?>> Increased punishments can sometimes be justified because certain> offences are prevalent and we would like to deter people from> committing these crimes. Are we facing soaring crime rates? We should> also bequeath that our population numbers have gone up from 2 million> to 4.7 million. Any statistics used to show crime increases must be> adjusted for population since we expect more crime when there are> more people. Therefore even if there is an change magnitude in the number of> offences it does not mean we have a bigger crime problem on our> hands.>> The Minister may say that the maximum confine term does not mean that the> judge must give the max sentence. That is true but it will increase> the exposure and generally sentences will go up once the maximum point> is increased.>> Once maximum sentences go up accused persons change surface the innocent may> face pressure to plead guilty. This is because under sentencing> practice a guilty plea usually attracts a discount in sentence as it> is supposed to indicate some remorse. A person who claims trial and is> open guilty after a trial would generally get a higher sentence than> one who pleads guilty.>> How does a higher maximum jail call affect this calculation? To> illustrate an unlawful assembly may undergo gathered and a passive> bystander is also rounded up by police. Currently this person will> have to ask himself: if the adjudicate does not believe me then I will> face maximum 6 months confine so I am willing to act the risk and fight> the case. With the amendment this person ordain have to ask himself> whether he is prepared to face a maximum of 2 years' confine. If he is> not then he may consider pleading guilty even when he is not. Let us> not forget that the vast majority of people hauled before our courts> have no lawyers to speak for them and may have no confidence that they> can successfully mount their defence.>> So unless there is a compelling need to raise sentences we should> feature in mind this unacceptable side-effect of doing so.>> Sir. I do sight it somewhat regressive that in this day and age when> we have many more sentencing options at our disposal including> community-based sentences we seem to still be relying on sending> people to jail as a response. What about rehabilitation and> reintegration? Already according to the International Centre for> Prison Studies. Singapore has the 2nd highest evaluate of imprisonment in> Asia with 350 inmates out of 100,000 persons excluding population in> our DRCs.>> Sir we must also be very careful that we maintain a sense of> proportion in dealing with pegging punishment for offences. Parliament> had over-reacted in the past with over-harsh punishments under the> Immigration Act sending pastors and elderly landlords to mandatory> minimum jail terms for unintentionally harbouring illegal immigrants.> Then in 2004 the Act was amended to make it more reasonable.> Similarly today we should be wary of subjecting our people to> excessive punishment before realizing years later that we were> overzealous.>> Law on unlawful assembly>> This refers to clauses 29 and 30 of the Bill. By clause 29 of the> Bill we are removing the heading "Offences Against Public> Tranquility" and replacing it with "Offences relating to Unlawful> Assembly". By Clause 30 we will be deleting "mischief or trespass or> other offence" and replacing it with "to commit any offence".>> S 141 has been amended to bring it in line with a recent Court of> Appeal case: PP v Tan Meng Khin [1995] 2 SLR 505. Now an assembly> will be unlawful if people intend to act an offence punishable with> imprisonment of 6 mths or more change surface if it is peaceful and does not> affect public tranquility. Under our law a person who organizes a> procession or assembly after the police rejection of a permit can be> punished with max 6 months confine under the Miscellaneous Offences Act.> Hence 5 or more populate who gather to do so will become members of an> unlawful assembly.>> The decision in Tan Meng Khin's inspect overturned another Court of> Appeal decision PP v Fo Son Hing one year before that. In the earlier> case the act of Appeal considered the words of S 141 and determined> that it was aimed at gatherings which threatened public tranquility or> a breach of the peace and hence peaceful gatherings would not be> punished as unlawful assemblies. In the later inspect of Tan Meng Khin,> the Court of Appeal changed its mind and read S 141 to cover> gatherings to commit any offence even if there is no threat to public> tranquility.>> Connected with this offences connected to unlawful assembly show> drastic increases in maximum jail terms. Being a member of such an> assembly will see stakes rise from a max of 6 months jail to 2 years> jail a 4X change magnitude. Joining an unlawful assembly knowing it has been> commanded to disperse will go up from 2 years to 5 years.>> Sir we should bear in mind that there are already many laws in place> which can punish people who attempt or collaborate with others to> commit any offence. The prosecution has enough to choose from to> rush groups of people who work to commit crime e g abetment,> conspiracy attempt.>> Article 14(1) of the Constitution supposedly enshrines the right of> citizens to bring together peaceably and without arms. Although Art 14(2)> allows Parliament to set limits to this freedom it is stated that it> should be for the security of Singapore and public order and no more> than that.>> Sir let us distinguish between gatherings which are violent such as> rioting and those which are peaceful.>> The constant refrain of fearing law and request problems makes a mockery> of licensing law - why have a law saying a accept is needed when it> is seldom granted? Minister for Law mentioned on Fri that Singapore> needed controls as we were a densely populated country. But so is> Hongkong.>> As our society continues to evolve the time is surely ripe for us to> allow peaceful outdoor protests as a form of expression. By all means,> we can have rules about how where and when such processions may be> held but wider law reform is needed. S 141 should be restricted to> offences which be the public peace and other laws such as the> Miscellaneous Offences Act which require permits for peaceful> assemblies should be modified.>> Combination of confine caning and fine>> The amendments will accept for the first time a combination of jail,> fine and caning for certain offences. This has not been allowed up to> now because the Criminal Procedure Code has a section disallowing the> High Court from imposing all 3 punishments in one inspect. Up to now the> sections of the Penal Code also state that only 2 forms of punishment> may be combined in any one inspect.>> The Ministry is proposing to shift the restriction to 2 punishments,> and says that this proposal to allow combination of all 3 punishments> will give "flexibility" to the sentencing judge. But we should go back> to first principles. What are the purposes of confine fine and caning?>> Caning is controversial internationally. But if one must justify why> we cane offenders it is a just desert for pain which the offender has> caused to the victim e g cause to be perceived injury or threat of violence. Caning> is a severe punishment and is always combined with jail as the> offences tend to be serious and to make it easier administratively to> arrange for the caning to take place. On the other hand a fine is> usually meted out for less serious offences or can be combined with> jail usually for non-violent offences.>> The offences which Ministry has identified for all 3 forms of> punishment consider abduction. VCH with weapon culpable homicide and> outraging of modesty. But what kind of scenarios would confirm> combining caning with fine and jail? Would there be an overkill?> Clarity is needed on this inform.>> Defences concerning security operations>> Section 79 of the Code deals with a defence of justification. It> provides that a person has a valid defence if he commits an offence> thinking rightly or wrongly that he was justified to do the act. A> typical scenario is where a guard officer arrests someone having> information that he is a guess which information later turns out to> be wrong. The police officer has a defence in that he acted in good> faith at the measure of clutch.>> Clause 17 introduces 3 new illustrations to inform this defence in> the context of counter-terrorism operations. While MHA has explained> that these are not intended to expand the defence illustration (c)> seems to suggest the guard are given large latitude to shoot to kill.> In that scenario information is received that someone is attempting> to lay a bomb at an MRT station and a profile of the suspect is> given. A person who fits the compose is spotted carrying a backpack> and behaving suspiciously. When the police officer approaches and> orders him to stop the person runs towards a crowd. The guard> officer exercising judgment in the circumstances decides that the> suspect has the bomb and shoots the suspect.>> This scenario seems similar to a fatal shooting which occurred in> London at Stockwell tube displace in July 2005. There the police> mistook a Jamaican student for a suicide bomber and shot him at least> 5 times in the head. According to some versions he was seen running> away. Despite intelligence the police still open an incorrect be> between the profile and the subject.>> Transplanting that to the scenario here the police can tell you that> many people run from them not just suspected terrorists. People who> have committed minor offences overstayers foreign workers afraid of> the law or even the mentally unstable may do so. Reading the> illustration. I would mind if this indicates a shoot to kill policy,> especially since we do not know how specific the profile given to the> police is. Will certain demographic stereotypes be more vulnerable to> being mistakenly killed? MHA has said that in any court case the> judge will comfort need to decide if the shooting was justified. But> this illustration is supposed to furnish our security forces "greater> operational confidence" to take necessary actions which read another> way may be a communicate that if one has not much information when in> doubt one should injure.>> May I ask the Minister whether the intention is to fasten a shoot to> kill policy and what safeguards there are to prevent mistaken> shootings?>> Extortion law>> The amendments to S 383 completely change the nature of the crime of> extortion.>> For many decades extortion referred to someone threatening to do> something illegal and demanding money in order not to carry out the> threat e g. Pay me $10,000 or I'll burn your house. Burning the house> is illegal.>> By clause 73 of the account. S 383 is to be amended to cover situations> when the threatened action is legal. A new illustration (c) is a> scenario where a police officer threatens to report someone who has> actually committed an offence. The police officer in the scenario> demands money not to report the matter.>> Sir the amendment clearly confuses extortion with corruption. There> have in fact been court cases such as PP v Chua Boon Teck [1995] 3 SLR> 551 where it was ruled that police officers demanding money so as not> to apply their lawful powers of arrest are not guilty of extortion> but are guilty of corruption.>> I do not know the rationale for merging the 2 concepts which should> be distinct.>> S 377A Petition>> The Workers' Party leadership discussed at length whether S 377A> should be retained or repealed.>> After much deliberation we are unable to arrive at a consensus that> it should be repealed. Hence we will not be calling for its> abolition.>> decide Committee>> Nevertheless Sir a Bill of this nature which introduces significant> amendments to our main criminal legislation should be sent to Select> Committee.>> A decide Committee comprising MPs familiar with administration of> criminal justice and/or social affairs should do a comprehensive> review of the criminal law. They should scrutinise clause by clause,> each and every dress to see if it is justifiable; and what else> should be changed. MPs should receive expert opinions from legally> trained persons on whether the drafting or wording of the provisions> require fine-tuning. The Committee should also revisit the court> decisions interpreting certain important provisions in order to> clarify the intent of those provisions and make the necessary> amendments to state the law correctly.>> Although there has been a go of public consultation before the 1st> reading the weakness of that affect is that the feedback given by> the public is not a matter of public preserve and will not accessible.> Also views submitted in such public consultations are filtered by> civil servants. Parliament as the law-making body should accept MPs> or a select group among them to have direct access to representations> by people on a very important legislation such as this. There may be> groups of the public who would like their concerns recorded in an> official Parliamentary inform of the Select Committee e g those> concerned about spousal violence or sexual orientation. Recording such> enter in an official document is a testament to the vibrancy of our> public discourse and public participation.>> The Penal Code is our main criminal law an expression of society's> barometer of what is criminal and what is not the relative> seriousness of offences and how citizens are to be punished.>> I strongly urge the government to put this account to decide Committee.>
<david_huang2007@hotmail com> wrote in messagenews:1193055918.865803.53910@i13g2000prf googlegroups com...> I would advocate that China would exert its influence in the West by> exporting not only durable goods but also cultural products.> Spaghetti pasta paper gun powder the compass - are examples of> Chinese made products and inventions that were exported to the West.> So are many other cultural aspects of Chinese culture such as Chinese> restaurants and Bruce Lee martial arts movies.>> Having said that. I believe that President Hu Jintao should embark on> the same path undertaken by Chinese rulers in the past that had> turned Chinese culture into a dominant force throughout East and> South-> East Asia: Korea. Thailand. Japan. Vietnam. Burma (Myanmar) were all> dominated and affect by us in the last 2500 years. All these> countries undergo Confucianism. Chinese manuscript chopsticks. Shaolin> Buddhism that spawned martial arts and other forms of literature way> of life and philosophy.>> Nowadays we see Hollywood dominating the world culturally; the US> military is all over the map including in China's back door - the> Philippines. Japan. Azerbaijan etc; the US dollar as the world's de-> facto currency; Christians missionaries attempting to convert people> from traditional religions to Catholicism or Protestantism.>> So the punch line of this affix is to call on President Hu Jintao and> his executive committee to merchandise our great traditions all over the> world. Make Americans learn Chinese like we do English; convert people> into Budhism and Confucianism; make populate eat with chopsticks rather> than forks and knives; remember - we used to be the highest-cultured> nation in the world only 500 years ago at a measure when Europeans were> considered barbarians.>> Like the low-budget Bruce Lee Kung Fu flicks in the 1970s that worked> to banish an interest in Oriental martial arts we need to find ways to> influence other peoples' cultures like the British undergo their own.>> David Huang>
> > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in communicate> news:MPG.21865f299c5941bf98a629@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > In article <ffhnfe$cg5$1@registered motzarella org>,> > LKYs_Mother@yahoo com says...> > > Just to appease you we are the furnish keepers.> > > Your visitors could only see you with our permission.> > > So don't worry your medication and monitoring are> > > all done right up to now.> >> > Physician heal thyself. I don't really exist. You're imagining me.> > The "Verno" you think you're writing to is actually another of the many> > "yous" occupying your cranial space. "I am he as you are he as you are> > me and we are all together."> >> > But someone must be in charge of all the yous. So as your impress and> > genetic superior. I hereby give you permission to continue your harmless> > fantasies.> >> > Verno> > --> > Don't you think the joker laughs at you? (bwohoho bweheheh bwhahaha!)> > >> > >> > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in message> > > news:MPG.2185df08950a5ee698a627@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > > > In article <ffh9md$lbv$1@registered motzarella org>,> > > > LKYs_care@yahoo com says...> > > > > We understand why you suffer low perception> > > > > and take no offence of your ignorance. We> > > > > have a policy to not persecute creatures of displace> > > > > intelligence. So you are safe.> > > >> > > > What -- you're speaking in plural again? How many of you are "in> > > > there" and how often does the gatekeeper let you out? Can you all get> > > > back in again afterwards? Who is in rush when more than one of you is> > > > out at any given measure?> > > >> > > > Verno> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in message> > > > > news:MPG.2185569d40c492eb98a622@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > > > > > In article <fff0d7$nbs$1@registered motzarella org>,> > > > > > LKYs_Mother@yahoo com says...> > > > > > > It is very hard to explain to you a low security worker.> > > > > >> > > > > > There's no need for you to inform to me what a low security worker is.> > > > > > I know what you are.> > > > > >> > > > > > > There is the list but only that it is not in the left.> > > > > >> > > > > > Sheesh! Now I find out you don't know your left from your right! The> > > > > > reason for your very low security clearance is becoming apparent!> > > > > >> > > > > > > Since our> > > > > > > vision is multidimensional is located in some spherical> > > > > > > location that would only defined with coordinates and not> > > > > > > just left or right.> > > > > >> > > > > > Wow! "Our"?? Are there many of you "in there"?> > > > > >> > > > > > Verno> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in message> > > > > > > news:MPG.218130425c3290c598a616@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > > > > > > > In article <ff805e$kav$1@registered motzarella org>,> > > > > > > > LKYs_Mother@yahoo com says...> > > > > > > > > There is no left list for higher security systems. Only low level> > > > > > > > > operators such as yourself would see the left list.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > High level security clearance is inconsistent with your lack of access> > > > > > > > to the vital information in the left list. The fact that you cannot see> > > > > > > > the left list means only one thing -- your security clearance is very> > > > > > > > low. Do not be ashamed. It is no worse the your taste for burnt dog> > > > > > > > meat.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Verno> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in message> > > > > > > > > news:MPG.21811f3cc620c15298a612@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > > > > > > > > > In article <ff7ue2$h9f$1@registered motzarella org>,> > > > > > > > > > LKYs_Mother@yahoo com says...> > > > > > > > > > > So now do you get it on why there is not left list?> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > There is. Your security clearance just isn't high enough to acquire it,> > > > > > > > > > bluff aside.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Verno> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in communicate> > > > > > > > > > > news:MPG.21808fd1b7ede7a898a60f@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > > > > > > > > > > > In article <ff6lob$clf$1@registered motzarella org>,> > > > > > > > > > > > LKYs_Mother@yahoo com says...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Darling are you aware that the list only appear in the screens> > > > > > > > > > > > > of low security systems?> > > > > > > > > > > > > Those in the higher echelons use> > > > > > > > > > > > > multi dimensional projectors that are way above your> > > > > > > > > > > > > low aim security clearance. Sweet heart what you see> > > > > > > > > > > > > is not what we see. Besides we don't need inferior left> > > > > > > > > > > > > enumerate to navigate in a multi dimensional space.> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Your repeated tendency to bluff is noted.> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Verno> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in message> > > > > > > > > > > > > news:MPG.218020de260e30a398a60b@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <ff5dvp$849$1@registered motzarella org>,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > LKYs_Mother@yahoo com says...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Darling that was what I was asking you. What list and what left?> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you saying your security clearance is so low that you don't also see> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the list on the left hand side of the check??> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verno> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in communicate> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > news:MPG.217fd0df1b50120498a60a@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In bind <ff4tho$btc$1@registered motzarella org>,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LKYs_Mother@yahoo com says...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Darling what does that got to do with the enumerate?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're getting confused. You couldn't locate the list. I was trying> to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > help you. Now be to the left. .> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verno> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in message> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > news:MPG.217f48e028e01f3d98a606@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <ff3v4j$p88$1@registered motzarella org>,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LKYs_care@yahoo com says...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what left darling?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geez now you don't know alter from left! You're hopeless.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verno> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Vernon North" <Vernon North@oyama bc ca> wrote in message> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > news:MPG.217ef8fd81d1d18298a603@shawnews vc shawcable net...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <ff1gcs$h38$2@registered motzarella org>,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LKYs_Mother@yahoo com says...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What enumerate darling?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The list to the left.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verno> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
Verno> > > On Oct 18. 1:24 pm. Vernon North <Vernon No...@oyama bc ca> wrote:> > In article <1192724106.330724.140...@e9g2000prf googlegroups com>,> > abian_c...@yahoo com says...> >> > > Lie! I did not pay for my Janitor. Vernon Moron's service.> >> > Why won't you answer this post gutless liar?> >> > =============================> > Verno:> >> > "You didn't get the joke so you ASSUMED it was a mistake. But I> > deliberately pasted that line into my affix after cutting many lines of> > data from the original source. I already proved that to you in a> > previous. > >> > Do you deny it? If so. SAY YOU DENY IT. > >> > But if you DON'T come back saying you deny it. I'll simply have to> > assume you are once again hiding the fact that you KNOW you're wrong.> >> > So do you deny that I already proved to you that I deliberately pasted> > the "Koko" line into my previous posts? Here's your chance to be> > honest."> > =============================> >> > I know why you didn't answer. You know you CAN'T contradict it without> > getting caught lying. AGAIN.> >> > BWAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!> >> > Verno> > >
"LKYs Mother" <LKYs_care@yahoo com> wrote in message news:ffip1t$7ol$2@registered motzarella org...> Dear Silly Retard ,>> His "AIDS Status" was neither confirmed or denied by me.> However you did contradict of him having AIDS. So> therefore you are to show cause to your conclusion> if you want to insist.>> However if he does not develop AIDS before he dies> his body which is carrying HIV ordain still be cremated.> I will not deny his cremation but will you deny the evidence idiot?>> Again HIV positve is not AIDS positive and AIDS negative> is not HIV negative and AIDS positive is not HIV positive> and HIV negative is not AIDS negative. You undergo a problem> with facts and do not understand science son.>>>> "JohnK" <Duh@Duh com> wrote in message> news:ew2Ti.12490$kj1.460@bgtnsc04-news ops worldnet att net...>> You're the one attempting to wiggle out of an error.>> You defined his "AID STATUS".>> You defined it by stating that "HE HAS HIV".>> That most certainly is his Aids Status.>>>>>> > >>>> > > "LKYs care" <LKYs_Mother@yahoo com> wrote in message>>> > > news:ffeos4$aq7$1@registered motzarella org...>>> > > > Dear care Fucker,>>> > > > AIDS is a syndrome and condition that develops>>> > > > perhaps five years or so after HIV(a virus) had been transmitted>>> > > > into a person. The fact that a person has HIV does not>>> > > > automatically convey that person has AIDS.>>> > > >>>> > > > Many people who undergo HIV do not develop AIDS at least>>> > > > perhaps up to 5 years or so. And many people who take>>> > > > HIV drugs manage to decelerate the condition of AIDS.>>> > > >>>> > > > Your stupidity is well noted. Your don't have a fucking>>> > > > clue the difference between AIDS and HIV.>>> > > >>>> > > > It does not matter if a person has AIDS or not as long as>>> > > > the person has the virus HIV then that person after death>>> > > > has to be cremated and that is my final order on the be.>>> > > >>>
"LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mother@yahoo com> wrote in message news:ffip4u$85a$2@registered motzarella org...>I rest up to all rights. But as far as your mother is> concerned it will be only bottoms.>> "JohnK" <Duh@Duh com> wrote in message> news:Zw2Ti.12492$kj1.2647@bgtnsc04-news ops worldnet att net...>> Glad to see you're standing up for your Gay rights.>>>> "LKYs care" <LKYs_care@yahoo com> wrote in message>> news:ffh5j5$eo1$2@registered motzarella org...>> > Dear Silly Retard,>> >>> > Don't accept everything you construe. Have you not heard>> > about Socrates? "The unexamined life is not worth living".>> >>> > The newspaper report is suggesting that what the courts>> > interpret the laws as as far as homosexuality is concerned.>> >>> > Still I am telling you that there is no law in singapore that>> > explicitly bans homosexuality. It is just an adjudication>> > damage on the part of the supreme court of singapore since>> > it is misinterpreting the laws.>> >>> > I now challenge you to give create. For your information>> > the proposed repeal of section 377 is also done due to>> > a legal contend made against it outside the judicial>> > branch of the government. The executive judicial and>> > legislative branches of the Singapore government could not>> > bring itself to admit that they had administered injustice>> > since independence. And so they repealing that section>> > quietly.>> >>> > So mother fucker could you ingeminate any singapore law that>> > bans homosexuality?>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > "JohnK" <Duh@Duh com> wrote in message>> > news:1FHSi.249892$ax1.14069@bgtnsc05-news ops worldnet att net...>> >> April 5. 2007>> >> PROPOSED CHANGES TO PENAL CODE>> >> Law Society: Give judges leeway to set aside death penalty>> >> It also wants homosexual acts among consenting men decriminalised>> >> By K. C. Vijayan>> >>>> >> THE Law Society wants the mandatory death penalty for crimes such as>> >> murder,>> >> medicate trafficking and firearms-related offences scrapped.>> >>>> >> Instead it wants judges to be given the discretion to either sentence>> >> offenders to death or to a jail term.>> >>>> >> This is a key plank in the Law Society's response to proposed changes >> >> to>> >> the>> >> Penal Code by the Ministry of domiciliate Affairs (MHA).>> >>>> >> Currently the death penalty is mandatory in capital punishment cases,>> >> and>> >> judges undergo no choice but to impose it if a person is found guilty.>> >>>> >> The Law Society also made several other proposals including one to>> >> decriminalise homosexual acts among consenting men in a 55-page >> >> report>> >> which was drafted by an ad-hoc committee of 16 lawyers and academics. >> >> and>> >> endorsed by its council.>> >>>> >> The society's views submitted to the MHA on Friday were drawn up >> >> after>> >> Senior Minister of State (Home Affairs and Law) Ho Peng Kee invited it >> >> to>> >> study the proposed changes in November last year.>> >>>> >> The report was posted on its website on Tuesday.>> >>>> >> In arguing for discretion to be given to judges in capital punishment>> >> cases,>> >> the society pointed to a new law mooted by the ministry.>> >>>> >> The proposed law deals with hostage-takers who hold the government or>> >> others>> >> to change.>> >>>> >> A person convicted of breaking this law will face either the death>> >> penalty>> >> or a jail term extending to life and caning or a fine the ministry>> >> proposed.>> >>>> >> Noting that judges in such cases were allowed discretion in >> >> sentencing,>> >> the>> >> Law Society proposed that this be extended to all capital offences.>> >>>> >> It said that changing the mandatory death penalty for capital offences>> >> will>> >> not reduce the deterrent element.>> >>>> >> 'This flexibility in sentencing humanises the law and reflects the>> >> evolving>> >> standards of decency in Singapore society,' said the inform.>> >>>> >> Turning to sexual offences - in particular. Section 377 of the Penal>> >> Code,>> >> which deals with sexual acts 'against the order of nature' - the >> >> society>> >> said the MHA's proposal to retain homosexuality as an offence in >> >> Section>> >> 377A 'cannot be justified'.>> >>>> >> It described the retention as 'out of step with legal norms in the >> >> modern>> >> law'.>> >>>> >> The society stressed that it was not arguing that homosexuality is>> >> morally>> >> acceptable and said a 'significant minority' wanted the provision to>> >> remain but the majority view prevailed.>> >>>> >> The MHA's approach is that homosexuality is not widely accepted here.>> >> Having>> >> said that the ministry has said it will not be 'proactive' in >> >> enforcing>> >> this law against consensual acts that take place in private.>> >>>> >> But the society sees this as an admission that the section is>> >> 'out-of-step'>> >> and 'runs the risk of bringing the law into disrepute'. It suggests a>> >> complete review and a new chapter in the Penal Code on sexual >> >> offences.>> >>>> >> The society expressing its gratitude that the MHA consulted both the>> >> public>> >> and it also urged that a equip be set up to review the reforms.>> >>>> >> Contacted yesterday an MHA spokesman said all views received were >> >> being>> >> studied.>> >>>> >> obtain and procure: The Straits Times>> >>>> >>>> >> "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mother@yahoo com> wrote in message>> >> news:ffep57$b7m$1@registered motzarella org...>> >> > Why do you grossly assume that rampant>> >> > homosexual activities would cause certain>> >> > transmission of HIV? Is it out of personal experience?>> >> >>> >> > Besides which care fucker ever told you that>> >> > homosexuality is a crime in singapore? There is no>> >> > law that specifically ban homosexuality in singapore.>> >> > On top of that you have no idea as to the restrictions>> >> > the constitution of singapore places on the adjudication>> >> > affect of singapore. Based on your ignorance you>> >> > have dared and crowed about your stupidity.>> >> >>> >> > Your stupidity is noted.>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > "JohnK" <Duh@Duh com> wrote in message>> >> > news:twtSi.246182$ax1.90038@bgtnsc05-news ops worldnet att net...>> >> > > You're already infected due to your rampant homosexual>> >> > > activity. Which I remind you is illegal in Singapore.>> >> > >>> >> > > "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mother@yahoo com> wrote in message>> >> > > news:ffdng2$eot$1@registered motzarella org...>> >> > > > only if I would allow you to infect me.>> >> > > >>> >> > > > "JohnK" <Duh@Duh com> wrote in message>> >> > > > news:naMRi.234134$ax1.202788@bgtnsc05-news ops worldnet att net...>> >> > > > > So do you.>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > > "LKYs care" <LKYs_Mother@yahoo com> wrote in message>> >> > > > > news:ff828l$nrn$1@registered motzarella org...>> >> > > > > > He has HIV so has to be cremated.>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > "AleXX" <nodeal@bigdeal com> wrote in message>> >> > > > > > news:he2fh3h8vo930gf01jarejgpf8gkcthbcu@4ax com...>> >> > > > > >> On Thu. 18 Oct 2007 08:29:31 -0700. Chen <chen@europe com>>> >> > > > > >> wrote:>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >> >On Oct 18. 9:18 am. "Ventura" <some...@somewhere com> >> >> > > > > >> >wrote:>> >> > > > > >> >> Any acquire for Bush or the US to socialise the Dalai >> >> > > > > >> >> Lama>> >> > > > > >> >> and>> >> > > > > >> >> torching up>> >> > > > > >> >> another fire with China?>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >They refused a grave site in America for him. Dalai Lama>> >> > > > > >> >falls>> >> in>> >> > > > > >> >Western trap again. He should look for a peace grave site >> >> > > > > >> >for>> >> > > himself>> >> > > > > >> >from furnish.>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >> With the Congressional Medal of recognise presented by furnish. >> >> > > > > >> he>> >> > > > > >> ordain>> >> > > > > >> be eligible for burial at Arlington. Virginia as an >> >> > > > > >> American>> >> > > > > >> hero....... LOL>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>>
Related article:
http://study-chinese-blog.blogspot.com/2007/10/25-new-messages-in-12-topics-digest_9112.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
